Physicochemical and Acute Toxicity Study of Gunja (Abrus precatorius) Pericarp

 

Dr. Dev Nath Singh Gautam

Associate Professor, Department of Rasa Shastra, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005 Uttar Pradesh, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: drdnsgautam@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The aim of the present research work was to carry out the effect of Shodhana on Gunja pericarps by using advanced analytical tools and acute toxicity study. Abrus precatorius Linn (Fabaceae), is used widely in different Ayurvedic formulations with enormous therapeutic importance. The red varieties of Gunja seed’s pericarps were subjected to Swedana in cow’s milk and Kanji. The Ashodhita and Shodhita red Gunja pericarps were subjected to physicochemical and acute toxicity study. For the establishment of the effect of Shodhana, the percentage of total ash, acid insoluble ash, total protein and successive extractives were carried out on Ashodhita and Shodhita red Gunja pericarps. The acute toxicity study was carried out as per Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines 423. In acute toxicity study, the intraperitoneal dose of Ashodhita (unpurified) and Shodhita (purified) red pericarps of Gunja was administered to in a single dose and general behavior, adverse effects, and mortality were determined up to 72 h. The study showed that the percentage of total ash was reduced in Shodhita samples as compared to Ashodhita samples. The percentage of alcohol and water-soluble extractives in milk Shodhita pericarps were increased in all the samples, however, no significant variations were observed in Kanji Shodhita samples. In acute toxicity, Ashodhita red varieties of the pericarp of Gunja were found toxic whereas neither mortality nor any significant alteration in behavior was observed in the pericarp of milk and Kanji Shodhita Gunja. The study showed that Shodhana in Kanji is more effective.

 

KEYWORDS: Gunja, Shodhana, Kanji, Pericarps, Toxicity.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

A. Precatorius (Fabaceae), commonly known as Gunja, is a woody twinning herb, found almost in all tropical countries, ascending to altitudes up to 1 200 m.1 with distinctive toxic Rakta seeds through black mark at the base. Leaves of the plant look like tamarind leaves having 20-40 leaflets. The plant is much branched, perennial, woody, slender, spiky twining. The stems of the plant are wrinkled, cylindrical with smooth surface and brown in color.

 

 

Leaves of the plant are differentiated by 7-20 pairs of leaflets, stipulate, turgid, obtuse, oblong, and truncate at both ends. Flowers are pinkish white, auxiliary racemes but shorter than leaves. Pods are oblong, hairy, turgid, 3-5 seed are found with a black mark at the base.2 The seeds of Shodhita Gunja are used to treat alopecia (Indralupta)3,4, itching (Kandu)5, edema (Shotha)6, urinary disorders (Prameha)7 etc. Indian tribes are used Gunja seeds as purgative8, nervous disorders9, pneumonia, skin diseases10, abortifacient, antifertility11 and as antimicrobial agents12. It is good for eyes and Shukrajanan13. The root of Gunja is emetic, alexiteric and also used in nervous disorders, sore throat, dry cough, rheumatism, and leucoderma14,15. According to Ayurvedic literature, the seeds of Gunja are poisonous and it should be given to the patients after Shodhana16. Shodhana is an Ayurvedic technique which can remove impurities, make less toxic, minimize the side effect and improve the therapeutic efficacy of a drug17. Though some research work has been carried out on the effect of Shodhana on Gunja kernels18 there is very least research work on pericarps of Gunja Shodhana. So the aim of the present study was to establish the effect of Shodhana on the percentage of various physicochemical values and acute toxicity of Ashodhita and Shodhita red Gunja pericarps.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Separation of pericarps:

All the three varieties of seeds were coarsely grounded and pericarps were separated.

 

Shodhana of Gunja in cow’s milk:

The red Gunja pericarps (250 g) were wrapped in a cotton cloth to form a Potali. The Potali was hanging in an iron pot holding cow’s milk in such a way that the Poali was totally immersed in milk but did not contact the bottom of the vessel. Heating (90°C) was given to the vessel by hot plate constantly for 6 h (2 Prahara) to aid the Swedana process. During the Swedana process, an adequate amount of fresh cow milk was added at regular gaps to uphold the level of milk in the vessel. After 6 h, the Potali was removed from the milk and pericarps were washed with hot water thrice and kept it for shade-dried 19.

 

Shodhana of Gunja in Kanji (sour gruel):

The process of Shodhana in Kanji was similar to that of milk except that the boiling time was 3 hours instead of 6 hours19.

 

Table 1: Ingredients of Kanji20

Drug

Botanical name

Part used

Quantity

Rice

Oryze sativa L.

Seeds

2.5 kg.

Kulthi

Dolichos uniflorus Lamk

Seeds

2.5 kg.

Saindhav Lavana

Sodium Chloride

 

2.5 kg.

Urad

Vigna radiate L.

Dough

625 gm.

Haldi

Curcuma longa  L.

Rhizome

625 gm.

Rai

Brassica nigra L.

Seed

625 gm.

Hingu

Ferula assa-foetida L.

Resin

625 gm.

Sarson

Mustard

Seed Oil

625 mL.

Vansha patra

Bambusa arundinaceae Retz.

Leaves

625 gm.

Jeerak

Cuminum cyminum L.

Seeds

375 gm.

Shunthi

Zingiber officinale Rosc.

Rhizome

375 gm.

Distilled water

 

 

80 Lt.

 

Preparation of Kanji (Sour gruel):

Rice and Kulthi were taken in stainless steel pots along with 40 liters of distilled water separately. The pots were placed over a mild fire, boiled and reduced to one fourth and filtered through cotton cloth. Both the prepared Kwath of rice and Kulthi were mixed and kept in an earthen pot layered inside with mustard oil. Hingu was fired in oil and rest of the ingredients (3-8) were mentioned above were also put in the pot. The mouth of the pot was tied by cloth and kept for 15 days and filtered before use. Thus 20 liters of Kanji was prepared (Table 1).

 

Estimation of different physicochemical values:

For quantitative estimation of total ash and acid insoluble ash, all the samples of Ashodhita and Shodhita pericarps of Gunja were carried out as per Ayurvedic Pharmacopeia20. The protein percentage was also calculated by the spectrophotometeric method described by Lowery et al 21 a standard curve at 700 nm absorbance was prepared with bovine serum albumin (B.S.A.) and 2% potassium sodium tartrate, 1% CuSO4.5H2O, 2% sodium carbonate in 0.1 NaOH were used as test solution21. Extraction with non-polar to polar solvents (alcohol and water) was made with the help of soxhlet apparatus and the percentage of each extractive was calculated after evaporating the respective solvents.

 

Experimental animals:

Acute toxicity test was performed as per Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guidelines 423 22. Experiments were performed using Swiss strain albino mice of either sex weighing between 20-30 gms. Animals were acclimatized for one week before using them, before experimentation the animals were kept fasting overnight. The animals were randomly divided into 3 groups each containing six mice. The animals were housed in polypropylene cages, in a temperature controlled environment (23±2ºC). Lighting was controlled to supply 12 h of light and 12 h of dark for each 24-h period. The mice were fed with standard laboratory animal prescribed food with water ad libitum.

 

Preparation of Drug Sample:

The Ashodhita and Shodhita pericarp powder were taken the weighed quantity of powder were dissolved in 100 mL of distilled water and macerated in the cold water and kept overnight for extraction. The material was then centrifuged and supernatant obtained was diluted with water as required for per kg body weight of mice about three different doses (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg b.w.) level of the drug were administered intraperitoneal route of the animals.

 

Drug administration:

The test substance was administered in a single dose by intraperitoneal route. Animals were fasted 3 h prior to dosing (only food was withheld for 3 h but not water). Following the period of fasting, animals were weighed and test substance was administered intra-peritoneal at a dose of 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg b.w. After the administration of the drug, food for the mice was suspended for 2 h. The injected mice were observed after 2 hours intervals for 24 hours. The effect of the test drugs on the mice was scored with the use of nine degrees with a scale of 0-8. Scoring was performed at the time of peak effect. The base score below and above 4 was subnormal response and the base score for the abnormal sign was 0-8 and 4 for normal sign.23

 

RESULTS:

Table 2: Shodhita red pericarp with milk

S.N

Parameters

Red pericarps

1.

Weight of Gunja pericarps

250 gm

2.

Volume of cow’s milk consumed

3 liter

3.

Total time consumed in the whole process of Shodhana of Gunja pericarps

7 hours

4.

Net volume of the total cow’s milk remained in the vessel of Dola-Yantra after the Shodhana process was over

3.3 liter

5.

Total consumed milk

1.0 liter

6.

Weight of Gunja pericarps obtained after the Shodhana process and dried in shade

220gm

7.

Colors after Shodhana process

Black

 

Table 3: Shodhita red pericarp with milk

S.N

Parameters

Red pericarps

1.                  

Weight of Gunja pericarps

250 gm

2.                  

Volume of Kanji consumed

2 liter

3.                  

Total time consumed in the whole process of Shodhana of Kanji pericarps

4 hours

4.                  

Net volume of the total Kanji remained in the vessel of Dola-Yantra after the Shodhana process was over

3.4 liter

5.                  

Total consumed Kanji

1.1 liter

6.                  

Weight of Gunja pericarps obtained after the Shodhana process and dried in shade

215 gm

7.                  

Colors after Shodhana process

Light yellow

 

Table 4: Physicochemical values Ashodhita and Shodhita red pericarps

SI. no

Parameters

Results

 

 

Ashodhita

Milk

Kanji

1.

Total ash

2.1

(% w/w)

1.9

 (% w/w)

1.6

(% w/w)

2.

Acid Insoluble ash

0.8

 (% w/w)

0.6

 (% w/w)

0.5

 (% w/w)

3.

Protein

1.1

0.2

0.08

4.

Alcohol soluble extractive 

7.8

(% w/w)

2.07

(% w/w)

1.11

(% w/w)

5.

Water soluble extractive

14.4

 (% w/w)

12

(% w/w)

8 (% w/w)

 

Table 5: Effect of Ashodhita pericarps of red Gunja on acute toxicity test in mice

Awareness

Alertness

Slight CNS depression.

This depression was directly related to the dose of test drug.

 

Visual placing

No change in animal response when placed in different positions.

 

Stereotypy

No effect was seen.

Mood

Grooming

unaffected

 

Restlessness

Absent in the unaffected mice.

 

Irritability

Aggressiveness

 

Fearfulness

Absent

Motor activity

Spontaneous activity & reactivity

Sluggish, dose related

 

Touch response

Present

 

Pain response

Present

CNS excitation

Tremors

Absent

 

Convulsions

Absent

Posture

Body posture

No effect

Muscle tone

Limb tone

Elongated

 

Body tone

Tail both are dose-related

Reflexes

Pinna

Absent

 

Corneal

Absent

Autonomic

Pupil size

No effect

 

Salivation

No effect

 

Body temperature

No change

 

Skin color

Slight brown at site of injection

 

Heart rate

Decreased

 

Respiratory rate

Decreased

 

Table 6: Effect of milk Shodhita pericarps of red Gunja on acute toxicity test in mice

Awareness

Alertness

No change

 

Visual placing

No effect

 

Stereotypy

No effect

Mood

Grooming

No effect

 

Restlessness

Absent

 

Irritability

Slight excitation 

 

Fearfulness

Absent

Motor activity

Spontaneous activity & reactivity

No effect

 

Touch response

Present

 

Pain response

Present

CNS excitation

Tremors

Absent

 

Convulsions

Absent

Posture

Body posture

No effect

Muscle tone

Limb tone

No effect

 

Body tone

No effect

Reflexes

Pinna

No effect

 

Corneal

No effect

Autonomic

Pupil size

No effect

 

Salivation

No effect

 

Body temperature

No change

 

Skin color

Light brown at the site of injection

 

Heart rate

Decreased

 

Respiratory rate

Decreased

 

Table 7: Effect of Kanji Shodhita pericarps of red Gunja on acute toxicity test in mice

Awareness

Alertness

No change

 

Visual placing

No effect

 

Stereotypy

No effect

Mood

Grooming

No effect

 

Restlessness

Absent

 

Irritability

Slight excitation 

 

Fearfulness

Absent

Motor activity

Spontaneous activity & reactivity

No effect

 

Touch response

Present

 

Pain response

Present

CNS excitation

Tremors

Absent

 

Convulsions

Absent

Posture

Body posture

No effect

Muscle tone

Limb tone

No effect

 

Body tone

No effect

Reflexes

Pinna

No effect

 

Corneal

No effect

Autonomic

Pupil size

No effect

 

Salivation

No effect

 

Body temperature

No change

 

Skin color

light brown at the site of injection

 

Heart rate

Decreased

 

Respiratory rate

Decreased

 

Table 8: CNS activity and acute toxicity screening of Ashodhita pericarps of red Gunja

 

Pericarps

 

0.5 mg

 

1.0 mg

2.0 mg

Awareness

 

 

 

Alertness

4

4

4

Visual placing

4

4

3

Stereotypy

4

3

3

Mood

 

 

 

Grooming

4

4

4

Restlessness

4

4

4

Irritability

4

4

3

Fearfulness

4

4

3

Motor activity

 

 

 

Spontaneous activity & reactivity

4

4

4

Touch response

4

4

3

Pain response

4

3

3

CNS excitation

 

 

 

Tremors

3

3

3

Convulsions

4

4

3

Posture

 

 

 

Body posture

4

3

3

Muscle tone

 

 

 

Limb tone

4

4

3

Body tone

4

4

4

Reflexes

 

 

 

Pinna

4

4

4

Corneal

3

3

3

Autonomic

 

 

 

Pupil size

4

4

4

Salivation

4

4

4

Body temperature

4

3

3

Skin color

4

4

4

Heart rate

4

4

4

Respiratory rate

3

3

3

 

Table 9: CNS activity and acute toxicity screening of milk Shodhita pericarps of red Gunja pericarps

 

Pericarps

 

0.5 mg

1.0 mg

2.0 mg

Awareness

 

 

 

Alertness

4

4

4

Visual placing

4

4

4

Stereotypy

4

4

4

Mood

 

 

 

Grooming

4

4

4

Restlessness

4

4

4

Irritability

4

4

4

Fearfulness

4

4

4

Motor activity

 

 

 

Spontaneous activity & reactivity

4

4

4

Touch response

4

4

4

Pain response

4

4

4

CNS excitation

 

 

 

Tremors

4

4

4

Convulsions

4

4

4

Posture

 

 

 

Body posture

4

4

4

Muscle tone

 

 

 

Limb tone

4

4

4

Body tone

4

4

4

Reflexes

 

 

 

Pinna

4

4

4

Corneal

4

4

4

Autonomic

 

 

 

Pupil size

4

4

4

Salivation

4

4

4

Body temperature

4

4

4

Skin color

4

4

4

Heart rate

4

4

4

Respiratory rate

4

4

4

 

Table 10: CNS activity and acute toxicity screening of Kanji Shodhita pericarps of red Gunja pericarps

 

Pericarps

 

0.5 mg

1.0 mg

2.0 mg

Awareness

 

 

 

Alertness

4

4

4

Visual placing

4

4

4

Stereotypy

4

4

4

Mood

 

 

 

Grooming

4

4

4

Restlessness

4

4

4

Irritability

4

4

4

Fearfulness

4

4

4

Motor activity

 

 

 

Spontaneous activity & reactivity

4

4

4

Touch response

4

4

4

Pain response

4

4

4

CNS excitation

 

 

 

Tremors

4

4

4

Convulsions

4

4

4

Posture

 

 

 

Body posture

4

4

4

Muscle tone

 

 

 

Limb tone

4

4

4

Body tone

4

4

4

Reflexes

 

 

 

Pinna

4

4

4

Corneal

4

4

4

Autonomic

 

 

 

Pupil size

4

4

4

Salivation

4

4

4

Body temperature

4

4

4

Skin color

4

4

4

Heart rate

4

4

4

Respiratory rate

4

4

4

 

DISCUSSION:

The objective of the present research work is to study the effect of Shodhana on the Gunja, which is attributable to pericarps of A. precatorius of red seed. In this perspective red pericarp of Gunja were processed in cow’s milk and Kanji and subjected to various physicochemical tests and acute toxicity study. The physicochemical evaluation is essential factors which facilitate and distinguishing the adulteration or inappropriate handling of the crude drug. The ash values are such type of quantitative standards which characterize the presence of different impurities like silica, oxalate and carbonate, this type of adulterant commonly occurring in crude drugs. As brought out by the present studies, the percentage of total ash is decreased in the Shodhita material suggested that leaching out of some amount of inorganic salts may have occurred during Shodhana while acid insoluble ash consists mainly silica and indicate contamination with earthy material24. Similarly, the decrease in protein percentage in Shodhita sample is due to the dissolution of water-soluble protein in Shodhita material. Simultaneously the decrease was more prominent in Kanji as compared to milk, suggesting that Shodhana process by Kanji is much better than milk. The percentage of alcohol and water-soluble extractive value decreases, which is possibly due to the extraction of water and alcohol soluble substances like sugar, glycosides, in milk and Kanji (Table 4). This study proved showed that Shodhana in Kanji is more effective. These observations regarding organoleptic character showed that there was a change in the color of red pericarps (red to black), and the same time a minute decrease in weight was also observed in  Shodhita pericarps but there is no change in shape except they become soft (2,3)25,26. The aqueous extract of red pericarps of Gunja seed in three different doses was administered intra-peritoneal to the animals. The observations were taken on the neurological behavior autonomic studies. The injected mice were observed after 2 hours intervals for 24 hours. The effect of the test drugs on the mice was scored with the use of nine degrees with a scale of 0-8. Scoring was performed at the time of peak effect. The base score below and above 4 was the subnormal response and the base score for the abnormal sign was 0-8 and 4 for the normal sign. In the CNS activity including awareness (alertness), mood (irritability), motor activity (reactivity), CNS excitation (convulsion) and autonomic responses (skin color, heart, and respiratory rate) considerable variations were observed in Ashodhita and Shodhita red Gunja. Overall effects have been summarized in Table 5-10. On the basis of the present study, it was concluded that red Gunja is suitable for medicinal purposes with respect to their physicochemical and neurological behavior autonomic behavior. It is also interesting to note that the more reduction in toxicity was observed in Kanji Shodhita Gunja.

 

CONCLUSION:

The more reduction in toxicity was observed in Kanji Shodhita as compared to the milk Shodhita. The study showed that Shodhana in Kanji is more effective. Therefore, all the analytical tools used in this study can be used as a marker for Shodhana.

 

REFERENCES:

1        Sharma S. Rasatarangini (Rewrite by Shastri K.), 11th Edition, Varanasi, Motilal Banarasidas, Publisher. 1998; Verse 2/37.

2        Kritikar KR, Basu BD. Vol. 1. Dehra Dun: International Book Distributors; 1999. Indian Medicinal Plants. 1999; pp. 766.

3        Saha D, Sharma V, and Gautam DNS. Pharmaceutical and Analytical Study of Kasisa. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 8(5);2017: 108-114.

4        Kunte AH. Astanga Hridaya Samhita, 7th Edition, Chaukhambha Orientalia Varanasi. 1982; 8/20.

5        Chunekar KV, Bhava Prakash Nighantu, Commentary, 1st Edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan Varanasi.1974; 126-28.

6        Sharma PV, Kaidev Nighantu, 1st Edition, Chaukhambha Orientalia Varanasi.1979; 795-96.

7        Kirtikar KR, Basu BD. Indian Medicinal Plants, Allahabad India 1933; 764-67

8        Malhotra BK and Morrthy S. Some useful and medicinal plant of Chandrapur Distt. (Maharashtra state). Bulletin Botany of Survey.15;1973:13-21.

9        Roy S, Acharya R and Shukla VJ. Shodhana (Processing) of Gunja (Abrus precatorius Linn.) Seeds with Godugdha (Cow’s milk); a pharmaceutical analysis. International Journal of Ayurvedic Medicine.3(2);2012:68-75.

10      Saxena HO and Dutta PK. Studies on the Ethnobotany of Orissa. Bulletin Botany of Survey.17; 1975:124-31.

11      Tarafder CR. Ethnogynaecology in relation to plants.Used in antifertility and conception. Journal of  Economic and Taxonomic Botany.5;1983:483- 90.

12      Bennet SR. Ethnobotanical studies in West Sikkim. Indian Journal of  Economic and Taxonomic Botany.7;1985:317-32.

13      Patel MH, Doshi KA, Winston C. Gunja (Abrus Precatorious Linn.)- A Noxious Plant-A Review. Pharmaceutical Science Monograph. 6(3);2015:41-55.

14      Verma S. Phytochemical and pharmacological study on Abrus precatorius. Asian Journal of Plant Science Research. 6(2);2016:24-26.

15      Sivakumar R. Studies on wound healing activity of red and block coloured seed, white coloured seed extracts of Abrus precatorius L. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Bio Sciences.2(1);2011:303-312.

16      Chuneker, KC, Bhavprakash Nighantu, Chaukhambha Orientalis 1969:354-56, Varanasi.

17      Belge RS, Belge AR. Ayurvedic Shodhanna treatments and their applied aspect with special reference to Loha. Journal of Pharmaceutical Biological Sciences. 2;2012:45-49.

18      Gautam DNS, Singh PN, Mehrotra S. Comprative study of procssed (shodhit) and unprocessed seeds of Gunja-Abrus precatorius L. Natural Product of Sciences. 5(3);1999:127-33.

19      Sen G. The Ayurvedic system of medicine 2, 42, Logos, Press, New Delhi, 1906.

20      Govt. of india, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India,2nd Edition, Manager of publication of Government of India.1966. 947-948.

21      Lowery OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Ramdall RH. Protein measurement with the Folin-Phenol reagent. J Biolog Chemi 1951; 193:256-275.

22      OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals (No. 423) "Acute Oral Toxicity-Acute Toxic Class Method" (Adopted on 17 December 2011).

23      Grimm, H., Turner, Robert, A.: Screening Methods in Pharmacology. Academic Press, New York, London;1965.

24      Kumar M, Prasad SK, Laloo D, Joshi A, Hemalatha S. Pharmacognostical and phytochemical standardization of Houttuynia cordata Thunb.: A potent medicinal herb of North–Eastern India and China. Pharmacognosy Journal. 6(1);2014:34-42.

25      Sharma V, Hem K, Seth A, Maurya SK. Standardization and antioxidant activity of an Ayurvedic formulation “Kushavleha”. International Journal of Green Pharmacy. 9(4);2015:55-62.

26      Tiwari V, Kumar BM, Sharma V, Gautam DNS. Accelerated stability study of Draksharishta. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 8(2);2017:209-15.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 08.01.2018           Modified on 12.02.2018

Accepted on 15.03.2018          © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(5):1935-1939.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00359.1